Ryan J. Richter

You are here: Home / posts

posts

By

Phoenix

Phoenix skyline, looking west.

Phoenix. The Valley of the Sun. Soon to be home to my sister and her girlfriend. They’re moving at the end of the month to start the next phase of their lives together. I am sad, of course, and yet happy for them on this exciting adventure. I am no expert in Phoenix, having only visited the city once, but as an urban planner, I am adept at researching city data. So, here I present some interesting facts and observations about Phoenix from a planning perspective.

It’s Big!

Phoenix’s population is 1.469 million people. The city alone accounts for 22% of the State of Arizona’s population, making it the primate city in the state. It’s the 6th most populous city, behind New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston and Philadelphia. It’s metropolitan area is home to two-thirds of all Arizonans. It’s footprint is gigantic as well. Lying in the Salt River Valley of the Sonoran Desert, Phoenix spreads out over 516 miles, more than twice the land area of Chicago. And for all that land, it’s not particularly dense, with only 2,800 people per square mile, or about a quarter of Chicago’s population per square mile. This kind of density is hard to support transit, but you might be surprised that one of the newest and most successful light rail lines was built in the city recently (more on that below).

Getting Around

Given the size of the urban area and the character of its urbanism (suburbanism), a car is essential for reasonable travel. Unfortunately, your visitors will be arriving via plane, as the last passenger rail service was suspended in 1996. Phoenix is the largest city without intercity passenger train service. However, visitors landing at Sky Harbor International Airport have the option of taking the train. The Metro light rail system, a 20 mile single line system serving 28 stations, opened in 2008. The line serves central Phoenix, Tempe and Mesa. Back to being big – Mesa, at almost 440,000 people, is the second largest suburb in the U.S., ranking above many major cities like Miami, Atlanta, and St. Louis.

Sky Harbor is the main Phoenix airport and has a Southwest hub, very important for travel back to Chicago. It’s the 10th busiest in terms of passenger traffic.

Roads are plentiful. The main interstates are 10 and 17. I-17 will take you to Sedona in 2 hours, Flagstaff in 2 and a half. I-10 will take you to L.A. in 7 hours or so. As a Chicagoan, I was struck by the size of the arterial roads in the Phoenix area. Six lanes with a double left turn lane are common. It’s no wonder everyone drives.

Similarities to Chicago

Not many as you might expect. But the obvious ones are sports related. The Chicago Cubs have the spring training home in Mesa, attracting a lot of Chicagoans to visit and retire. Also, not to be forgotten, is the fact that the Arizona Cardinals used to be the Chicago Cardinals until 1960. I also think Phoenix’s dominance as Arizona’s primate city and capital is somewhat similar to Chicago. And the prevalance of the cardinal direction street grid is familiar to Chicagoans.

 

Like all cities, Phoenix is fascinating and has an interesting story. From my perspective as an urban planner, particularly in the transportation realm, I am fascinated by the urban form of the region, how transportation or natural (or political) boundaries enforce the geography of a place. Phoenix has more stories to tell.

Cross posted at Transport Nexus.

By

The Trouble with Virginia

Today’s Republican Party has some serious challenges facing it. The demographics are not in its favor. It’s leaned perhaps too far to the right. It does not seem to have a coherent governing philosophy. It has lost the popular vote in five of the last six presidential elections. So how does the party right the ship?

By disenfranchising the voters.

Go ahead and read the links above. It’s not pretty. What pisses me off about this coming from an urban perspective is the blatant acknowledgement that apportioning electoral votes is necessary because urban areas can outvote rural areas:

Sen. Charles W. “Bill” Carrico, R-Grayson, said the change is necessary because Virginia’s populous, urbanized areas such as the Washington, D.C., suburbs and Hampton Roads can outvote rural regions such as his, rendering their will irrelevant.

Which is the point, isn’t it? If you can’t win over a majority of the population, perhaps you don’t deserve to win elected office. But, by the GOP’s logic, let’s just change the rules.

The problem with this isn’t that it’s more democratic, as the Republicans would have you believe. It’s that it is a deliberate effort to maintain the power given to them by the gerrymandered districts in numerous states that would allow normally blue states to swing red. Hence this legislation is popping up in places like Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan. All states that voted for Obama – twice.

Why does this matter, you ask? Because of the gerrymandering that turned strengthened the Republican control of the House after the 2010 census, a strong majority of U.S. Congressional districts now lean Republican. If, for example, the entire country were to award its electoral votes by district, Mitt Romney would have won the 2012 presidential election despite losing the popular vote by 4%.

What a way to run a democracy.

By

My kind of town

Via Urban Demographics

I am a Chicagoan. Born and bred. I grew up on the northwest side, attended high school in the suburbs, left the state for college and moved back. I love this city and am raising my two daughters here. So I can appreciate it when pictures like this are posted.

It’s also nice to see things like this.

So let me add my two cents as a native to this Quora discussion.

Here are my thoughts as a native Chicagoan.

Like one post says, “Chicago is the most American of cities.” I think this is largely true. We’re more diverse than you might think and we bristle at the idea that people from either coast think of us as “flyover country.” We also don’t compare ourselves with other cities in the Midwest. There’s a reason why we have the moniker “the Second City.”

That said, we’re second to none in a few things that matter. Food. Beside pizza, which is our specialty, our street food can’t be beat. Where else can you get a decent Italian beef or hot dog? This is the everyday stuff. Sure, we have the James Beard winners, Grant Achatz and Stephanie Izard and Rick Bayless of the world are here too, but I guarantee that’s not what most of us are eating. And yet people are surprised.

We’ve got world-class architecture, art and music to boot – in these categories we really are second to none. And yet people are surprised.

Sure, our Midwest work ethic and family ties keep us here, but I suspect the same in New York, San Francisco and L.A. Just not in SoHo or Park Slope or Haight-Asbury or Hollywood.

Beside the weather, the Midwest pleasantries, the work ethic and pizza, I’ll tell you what differences are important – and unique – to Chicago. It’s our fear. Of never being quite good enough. Of knowing that we have some of the best things in our city that the world has to offer and wondering if it’s enough for the New Yorker or Angeleno or San Franciscan. It’s never taking the city for granted – knowing that we don’t have great weather, we’re not the capital of the nation’s media and finance or culture. It’s our hard work that continually strives to build and to better our city. I think you find this ethos more strongly in Chicago than in most other places.

 

By

Welcome

Welcome to ryanjrichter.com! In case you don’t know me, I am the real Ryan J. Richter – accept no substitutions. Welcome to my next project, designed to showcase myself to the world, or at least the world-wide web. I am certainly not new to the internet, having established a transportation planning blog, Transport Nexus. This project is a little different, a little more personal.

I established Transport Nexus in February 2012 in part to discuss my profession as an urban planner outside of my real gig. They are not too keen on discussing work on the internet and I am not too keen on getting fired. So, Transport Nexus was my voice in my profession discussing urban transportation, planning, transportation politics and other urban planning items of interest to me. This new project, eponymously named, will allow me to showcase my other interests outside of planning. I’ll keep updating Transport Nexus with the urban planning stuff while posting everything else on this site.

First, a bit about myself. I am an urban planner (obviously) living and working in Chicago, my hometown. I work for Metra, the commuter rail agency in the Chicago region and help the agency to plan for development around its stations, a term planners call transit-oriented development. I’m also involved in spatial analysis, corridor planning and map production as needed.

Outside of work, I am married to a wonderful wife and have two daughters, ages 2.5 and 6 months. I live in Jefferson Park, on Chicago’s northwest side.

The interests I plan on exploring are maps, planted aquariums, beer brewing, history, politics, architecture, and various other musings, not in any particular order. This site is continually evolving and I hope to be posting early and often, as the saying goes. I hope you will join me in the fun and feel free to contact me via comment here, at Transport Nexus, or via email at ryan [at] ryanjrichter [dot] com.